Abstract

This article employs aspects of Jurgen Habermas's theory of communicative action and his concept of a lifeworld, alongside composition theory's use of community, to examine the effectiveness of guilt as a rhetorical strategy in two national environmental publications. It finds that, ultimately, for long-term cdmmunicative action to occur, environmental groups should not rely on guilt as a rhetorical strategy because outside their "discourse communities," it will not lead to "dialogue, deliberation, and consensus-building."

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
1997-04-01
DOI
10.1207/s15427625tcq0602_1
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (0)

No references on file for this article.