Technical Communication Quarterly Jul 2019

There’s No Such Thing as a Scientific Controversy

S. Scott Graham University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee ; Lynda Walsh University of Nevada, Reno

Abstract

We examine 81 rhetoric and technical communication studies of “scientific controversy.” Our praxiographic analysis reveals that “scientific controversy” is not one thing but three, each staged according to a radically different ontology; yet the literature continues to handle these ontologies the same and to privilege scientists’ demarcation claims in their analysis. We conclude the modifier scientific should be abandoned entirely in controversy studies and recommend an antilogical rather than dialectical approach to controversy.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2019-07-03
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2019.1571243
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Ghimire (2024)
    Understanding Transnational Technical Communication in Technical and Profession…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Marquardt (2022)
    Creationist Science and the Rhetorical Capacity of the Scientific Method
    Rhetoric Review
  3. Moriarty (2020)
    Vaccines Going Viral: Peripheral Public Discussion of Scientifically Justified …
    Rhetoric Review
  4. Walsh (2019)
    A Zero-Sum Politics of Identification: A Topological Analysis of Wildlife Advoc…
    Written Communication

References (48) · 6 in this index

  1. Besel R. D. (2008)
    Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A: The Humanities and Social Sciences
  2. Bitzer L. F. (1968)
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. 10.1177/1075547012454596
     ↗
  4. Butterfield H. (1965)
    The Whig interpretation of history
  5. Callon M. (2009)
    Acting in an uncertain world
Show all 48 →
  1. Carson R. (1962)
    Silent spring
  2. 10.5422/fordham/9780823256389.001.0001
     ↗
  3. 10.1353/rap.2010.0222
     ↗
  4. 10.1177/0306312702032002003
     ↗
  5. Crick et al. (2010)
    The Conduit Between Lifeworld and System: Habermas and the Rhetoric of Public S…
    Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  6. Rodríguez et al. (2014)
    Scientific Controversies and the Ethics of Arguing and Belief in the Face of Ra…
    Argumentation
  7. DeVasto et al. (2016)
    Stasis and Matters of Concern: The Conviction of the L’Aquila Seven
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. Edbauer (2005)
    Unframing models of public distribution: From rhetorical situation to rhetorica…
    Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  9. 10.1080/17524030802704369
     ↗
  10. Fahnestock J. (1997)
    Landmark essays on rhetoric of science: Case studies
  11. Fahnestock (2005)
    Rhetoric of Science: Enriching the Discipline
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  12. 10.7208/chicago/9780226190341.001.0001
     ↗
  13. 10.1353/rap.2013.0048
     ↗
  14. 10.2307/2095325
     ↗
  15. 10.1080/00028533.2005.11821636
     ↗
  16. 10.1080/00028533.2012.11821776
     ↗
  17. 10.7208/chicago/9780226264196.001.0001
     ↗
  18. 10.1080/00335639509384096
     ↗
  19. Gross A. G. (1997)
    Landmark essays on rhetoric of science. Case studies
  20. 10.1080/00028533.2005.11821640
     ↗
  21. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198206859.003.0001
     ↗
  22. Harris R. A. (2005)
    Rhetoric and Incommensurability
  23. 10.1017/CBO9780511841200
     ↗
  24. 10.1177/03063127030333004
     ↗
  25. 10.1086/421123
     ↗
  26. 10.1177/107554709101300105
     ↗
  27. Lyne J. (1997)
    Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science
  28. 10.1007/978-94-015-9890-3
     ↗
  29. 10.1080/00028533.2005.11821638
     ↗
  30. 10.1215/9780822384151
     ↗
  31. 10.1177/0963662506065558
     ↗
  32. 10.1080/00335630902842053
     ↗
  33. Prelli L. (1997)
    Landmark essays on rhetoric of science: Case studies
  34. 10.1177/107554708600800216
     ↗
  35. 10.1080/00028533.2012.11821773
     ↗
  36. Segal J. (2005)
    Health and the rhetoric of medicine
  37. 10.1177/016224399602100302
     ↗
  38. 10.1177/030631289019003001
     ↗
  39. Taylor C. A. (1996)
    Defining science: A rhetoric of demarcation
  40. Walker et al. (2012)
    “No One Yet Knows What the Ultimate Consequences May Be”: How Rachel Carson Tra…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  41. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199857098.001.0001
     ↗
  42. Zagacki K. S. (1992)
    Philosophy & Rhetoric 25(1)
  43. 10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/301
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Computers and Composition Sep 2026
    When writing students design AI chatbots: Integrating design thinking as a critical AI literacy practice ↗
    Jialei Jiang; Gustav Verhulsdonck
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy technical communication qualitative research literacy studies community literacy
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Mar 2026
    Canon to Code: Rhetorical Rulemaking for Generative AI Content Audits and Governance ↗
    Miriam F. Williams
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism assessment technical communication artificial intelligence
  3. Computers and Composition Mar 2026
    Shifting rhetorical agency in multimodal UX composition with AI: Sharing rhetorical authority with technologies ↗
    Nupoor Ranade; Daniel L. Hocutt
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism writing pedagogy technical communication multimodality
  4. Pedagogy Oct 2025
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy advanced composition creative writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions archival research multimodality artificial intelligence literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies literary studies editorial matter
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Apr 2025
    A Comparative Rhetorical Analysis of Trump and Biden's Climate Change Speeches: Framing Strategies in Politics ↗
    Shyam Pandey
    rhetorical criticism argument technical communication