Rhetoric Review Jan 1983

Why write . . . together?

Lisa Ede Oregon State University ; Andrea Lunsford
Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
1983-01-01
DOI
10.1080/07350198309359047
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (10)

  1. Tham (2025)
    Design and Deliberation: Reimagining Rhetorical Arrangement in Technical Commun…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Mussack et al. (2024)
    Collaboration as a Shared Value: Instructor and Student Perceptions of Collabor…
    Communication Design Quarterly
  3. Mussack et al. (2024)
    Collaboration as a Shared Value: Instructor and Student Perceptions of Collabor…
    Communication Design Quarterly
  4. Evans-Tokaryk (2014)
    Academic Integrity , Remix Culture, Globalization: A Canadian Case Study of Stu…
    Across the Disciplines
  5. Knievel (2008)
    Police Reform, Task Force Rhetoric, and Traces of Dissent: Rethinking Consensus…
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 10 →
  1. Sutton et al. (2002)
    Figuring rhetoric: From antistrophe to apostrophe through catastrophe
    Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. FORMAN (1991)
    Novices Work on Group Reports: Problems in Group Writing and in Computer-Suppor…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Thompson (1990)
    Electronic bulletin boards: A timeless place for collaborative writing projects
    Computers and Composition
  4. Lunsford et al. (1990)
    Rhetoric in a new key: Women and collaboration
    Rhetoric Review
  5. Beard et al. (1989)
    An Assessment System for Collaborative-Writing Groups: Theory and Empirical Eva…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication

References (0)

No references on file for this article.

CrossRef global citation count: 23 View in citation network → Build reading path →