Citation context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (163) · 8 in this index
-
Paper Mills: A Novel Form of Publishing Malpractice Affecting PsychologyMeta-Psychology
-
10.1126/science.aab3847
-
10.1038/530027a
-
10.1038/s41562-017-0224-0
-
An Yonghong et al. “High Prices and Market Power of Academic Publishing Reduce Article Citations.” ProMarket …
Show all 163 →
-
The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method ObsoleteWired Magazine
-
The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
-
The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation
-
The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation
-
ASA President’s Task Force. “Statement on Statistical Significance and Replicability.” AMSTATNEWS 1 Aug. 2021…
-
10.1511/2024.112.1.38
-
10.1038/533452a
-
10.1073/pnas.2407886121
-
10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0213
-
Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science
-
10.6017/ihe.2016.86.9358
-
10.1038/483531a
-
10.7554/eLife.96413
-
10.1038/s42256-022-00474-8
-
10.1037/a0021524
-
10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z
-
10.1126/science.adg9714
-
The Power and Perils of Peer ReviewRhetoric Review
-
10.1523/ENEURO.0032-23.2023
-
10.1038/s41562-022-01515-3
-
10.1126/science.acx9027
-
Acceptance Rates of Scholarly Peer-Reviewed Journals: A Literature SurveyEl Profesionel de la Información
-
10.1057/s41599-021-00903-w
-
Bosch Jason. “How Might Science Benefit From A World Without Journals?” Evidence & Reason [Blog] 26 Oct. 2019…
-
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
-
10.1126/science.adh2762
-
10.1126/science.adi6513
-
10.1126/science.362.6413.390
-
10.1098/rsos.230206
-
10.2307/j.ctv6wgfc3
-
10.1162/qss_a_00272
-
The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Communication
-
10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z
-
10.1126/science.aaf0918
-
Carey Benedict. “Fraud Case Seen as a Red Flag for Psychology Research.” New York Times 2 Nov. 2011 pp. A3.
-
Carey Benedict. “Psychology’s Fears Confirmed: Rechecked Studies Don’t Hold Up.” The New York Times 28 Aug. 2…
-
10.1353/rap.2010.0222
-
10.1038/d41586-024-01051-2
-
10.1002/1873-3468.14143
-
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
-
10.1038/d41586-023-03144-w
-
Currie George. “Open Science: Why You Should Preprint Your Next Paper.” eLife 7 May 2024 https://elifescience…
-
10.1007/s11192-016-2178-9
-
The Dark World of ‘Citation Cartels.’The Chronicle of Higher Education
-
Eisen Michael and Leslie B. Vosshall. “Coupling Pre-Prints and Post-Publication Peer Review for Fast Cheap Fa…
-
10.1038/d41586-024-01609-0
-
10.1038/d41586-021-00733-5
-
Future of Scholarly Publishing and Scholarly Communication: Report of the Expert Group to…
-
10.3998/dh.13030181.0001.001
-
Science and the Internet: Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age
-
The Routledge Handbook of Language and Persuasion
-
10.1075/aic.9.01fah
-
10.1073/pnas.1708272114
-
10.1126/science.aao0185
-
10.1038/d41586-024-00976-y
-
10.1511/2014.111.460
-
10.2307/j.ctv6sj8kf
-
10.1126/science.aad7243
-
Goodman Steven and Sander Greenland. “Assessing the Unreliabilty of the Medical Literature: A Response to ‘Wh…
-
Gould Elliot et al. “Same Data Different Analysts: Variation in Effect Sizes Dues to Analytical Decisions in …
-
10.7208/chicago/9780226068343.001.0001
-
10.1093/oso/9780195134544.001.0001
-
10.4324/9781315231099
-
10.1093/oso/9780190465926.001.0001
-
10.4324/9781032688503-3
-
10.1162/qss_a_00327
-
10.1075/pbns.308.02har
-
Landmark Essays in the Rhetoric of Science: Issues and Methods
-
Theorizing Digital Rhetoric
-
10.1038/s41562-023-01637-2
-
10.1075/pbns.54
-
10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
-
10.1177/1745691612464056
-
10.1093/biostatistics/kxt007
-
10.1126/science.334.6060.1225
-
10.1126/science.ado0309
-
Johnson Rob. “Beyond the Journal: The Future of Scientific Publishing.” FEBS Network 28 June 2024. https://ne…
-
10.1126/science.adj8309
-
Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to Decline
-
10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
-
The Replication Crisis Has Led to Positive Structural, Procedural, and Community ChangesCommunications Psychology
-
The End of JournalsCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
-
10.1126/science.361.6403.636
-
10.1038/s41562-018-0441-1
-
10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-054104
-
10.1038/s41586-024-07691-8
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
-
10.1038/d41586-023-01780-w
-
10.1073/pnas.2319488121
-
10.1126/science.362.6413.394-a
-
10.1126/science.359.6377.730
-
The Statistics Wars and Intellectual Conflicts of InterestConservation Biology
-
10.15252/embr.201541001
-
10.1126/science.362.6413.393
-
Written Communication
-
10.1075/pbns.308.03meh
-
The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Communication
-
10.1007/978-3-319-40295-6_1
-
10.37514/PER-B.2023.1800.2.16
-
10.1038/s41562-023-01637-2
-
10.1177/0306312718772086
-
10.1186/s13041-020-0552-2
-
A Manifesto for Reproducible ScienceNature Human Behavior
-
Reproducibility and Replicability in Science
-
10.1126/science.370.6522.1260
-
10.1126/science.adq8856
-
10.1126/science.aac4716
-
10.1002/asi.24568
-
10.1038/d41586-023-03177-1
-
10.1177/1745691612465253
-
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation
-
Written Communication
-
10.1126/science.adm9261
-
10.1126/science.adt3535
-
Piller Charles. “Star Botanist Likely Made Up Data About Nutritional Supplements New Probe Finds.” ScienceIns…
-
A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse
-
10.1038/nrd3439-c1
-
10.1038/s41562-024-01997-3
-
The Future of Academic Publishing: Eliminate Peer ReviewNature Human Behavior
-
University Says Prominent Food Researcher Committed Academic MisconductNature
-
10.1088/2058-7058/22/05/37
-
“Reproducibility of Scientific Results.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 3 Dec. 2019 https://plato.stanfo…
-
Ritchie Stuart. “The Big Idea: Should We Get Rid of the Scientific Paper?” The Guardian 11 Apr. 2022 https://…
-
10.7554/eLife.75830
-
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002255
-
10.1101/2023.05.06.23289563v2
-
10.1038/d41586-024-00159-9
-
10.1371/journal.pone.0290084
-
Changes in Scientific Publishing and Possible Impact on Authors’ Choice of JournalsChemTexts
-
10.1007/s00210-021-02056-8
-
10.1126/sciadv.abd1705
-
A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England
-
10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845
-
Science and the Internet: Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age
-
10.1093/femsle/fny130
-
10.1177/0956797611417632
-
Somers James. “The Scientific Paper Is Obsolete.” The Atlantic 5 Apr. 2018. https://www.theatlantic.com/scien…
-
10.1126/sciadv.adh1850
-
10.1371/journal.pbio.3000116
-
10.1177/1745691612460687
-
10.1098/rsta.2018.0145
-
10.1126/science.adg7879
-
Thorp H. Holden and Valda Vinson. “Change to Policy on the Use of Generative AI and Large Language Models.” h…
-
10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1
-
10.1038/d41586-023-03464-x
-
10.1038/d41586-023-03974-8
-
10.1038/d41586-024-02719-5
-
10.1177/1745691617751884
-
Written Communication
-
10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913
-
10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
-
The Rhetoric of Social ScienceThe Ethics of Rhetoric
-
Citizen Science in the Digital Age: Rhetoric, Science, and Public Engagement
-
Reproducibility in ScienceScience Signaling
-
Technical Communication Quarterly
-
Empirical Writing Assessment and the Identity Crisis in ScienceComposition Studies
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
-
Reliable Knowledge: An Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science