Abstract

This study examines how supervisor-candidate coauthoring collaborations contribute to doctoral students’ writer identity. Three candidates’ coauthorship experiences with their supervisors were investigated in depth using a multiple-case study design. Interviews, written reflections, and email correspondence between coauthors enabled thick descriptions of these candidates’ writer identity formation. Guided by Burgess and Ivanič’s framework of writer identity, the multiple-case study showed how the candidates’ autobiographical selves, discoursal selves, authorial selves, and perceived writer were influenced through the experience of coauthoring with supervisors. Notably, the candidates benefited from supervisor-candidate coauthorship by engaging in scholarly collaborations, bolstering their confidence as academic writers, and strengthening their authorial voice and rhetorical awareness. This study also reveals potential pitfalls or challenges of such collaborations, highlighting key considerations for supervisors and candidates considering coauthorship.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883241286902
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (51) · 10 in this index

  1. 10.1080/15348458.2020.1726758
     ↗
  2. 10.1007/978-3-030-62877-2_10
     ↗
  3. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
     ↗
  4. 10.1016/j.linged.2012.04.001
     ↗
  5. Written Communication
Show all 51 →
  1. Chaopricha S. (1997). Coauthoring as learning and enculturation: A study of writing in biochemistry [Unpublis…
  2. Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches
  3. 10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.001
     ↗
  4. 10.1007/978-3-030-85784-4_4
     ↗
  5. 10.1002/tea.20015
     ↗
  6. The 8th Postgraduate Supervision Conference
  7. Connecting the local, regional and international in doctoral education
  8. 10.1080/07924360120043882
     ↗
  9. 10.1007/s10734-022-00924-7
     ↗
  10. 10.1007/s11192-016-1849-x
     ↗
  11. 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8
     ↗
  12. Written Communication
  13. 10.1075/swll.5
     ↗
  14. 10.1080/09500780408666877
     ↗
  15. 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00034-0
     ↗
  16. 10.1080/03075070802049236
     ↗
  17. Written Communication
  18. 10.1080/03075079.2011.576755
     ↗
  19. Written Communication
  20. 10.1080/0158037X.2012.746226
     ↗
  21. 10.1080/03075079.2017.1405256
     ↗
  22. Changing practices of doctoral education
  23. 10.1080/07294360.2020.1852394
     ↗
  24. Written Communication
  25. 10.1080/14703297.2020.1799839
     ↗
  26. Studies in Higher Education
  27. 10.1017/S0267190514000178
     ↗
  28. 10.1007/978-3-030-62877-2_9
     ↗
  29. 10.1080/0307507022000011507
     ↗
  30. 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.008
     ↗
  31. 10.4324/9781003043782-6
     ↗
  32. Journal of Research Practice
  33. The art of case study research
  34. 10.1207/S15327701JLIE0102_02
     ↗
  35. 10.1080/07294360.2018.1441811
     ↗
  36. 10.1057/9781137030825_3
     ↗
  37. Written Communication
  38. Written Communication
  39. Written Communication
  40. 10.1080/0158037X.2024.2358006
     ↗
  41. 10.1080/07294360.2024.2354253
     ↗
  42. Written Communication
  43. 10.1007/s10805-010-9119-7
     ↗
  44. 10.1080/07294360.2020.1728522
     ↗
  45. Case study research: Design and methods
  46. Written Communication