The Communication Coefficient Method: A New Faculty Grading Tool Designed to Help Engineering Students Improve Their Technical Communication

Edward Londner; Matthew Dabkowski; Ian Kloo; J. D. Caddell

doi:10.1109/tpc.2023.3260479

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Jun 2023 OA PDF

The Communication Coefficient Method: A New Faculty Grading Tool Designed to Help Engineering Students Improve Their Technical Communication

Edward Londner MIT Lincoln Laboratory ; Matthew Dabkowski United States Military Academy ; Ian Kloo United States Military Academy ; J. D. Caddell

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Introduction: Engineering students benefit from understanding the role of technical communication in the professional workplace. This article examines the communication coefficient (CC), a new method for grading student technical communication intended to help students better understand this role. Its goal is to encourage students to treat their communication with the same importance that it has in the professional workplace. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">About the case: The core philosophy of the CC method is that audiences perceive technical work more positively when it is communicated well and more negatively when it is not. The method captures this philosophy mathematically: students’ grades result from multiplying the points earned for technical content by a number—the coefficient—representing how well they communicated that content. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Situating the case: The CC method is rooted in established principles, such as holistic grading and the separate yet simultaneous consideration of content and communication. It is novel in how it combines these principles into a grading technique. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Approach: The CC method was employed in three undergraduate engineering classes at the United States Military Academy during the spring 2020 semester. Student and instructor feedback were collected to gauge the pros and cons of the method and whether it is worth fielding on a larger scale. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Discussion: The CC method was found to encourage better student communication, although mixed student and instructor opinion suggest that changes to the method and the way that it is messaged are necessary. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusion: The CC method warrants further study and consideration of its usefulness in other departments and institutions.

Journal: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published: 2023-06-01
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2023.3260479
CompPile
Open Access: OA PDF Bronze
Topics: technical communication
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (80) · 8 in this index

10.18260/1-2--34651

↗
10.18260/1-2--32343

↗
10.18260/p.25944

↗
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00828.x

↗
10.1093/swr/svy026

↗

Show all 80 →

10.37514/PER-B.2009.2324.2.08

↗
10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

↗
10.1109/IPCC.2002.1049098

↗
10.18260/1-2--6639

↗
carvill (2002)

Integrating writing into technical courses: Steps toward incorporating communication into…

Proc Amer Soc Eng Educ Conf
10.18260/1-2--12559

↗
Brinkman et al. (2003)

Assessment of Communication Competencies in Engineering Design Projects

Technical Communication Quarterly
10.18260/1-2?9890

↗
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00711.x

↗
10.4324/9780203811269

↗
Dannels (2003)

Teaching and Learning Design Presentations in Engineering: Contradictions betwe…

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
10.1080/03634520302457

↗
Blakeslee (2001)

Bridging the Workplace and the Academy: Teaching Professional Genres through Cl…

Technical Communication Quarterly
10.3138/9781442676695-009

↗
10.1080/02602930801956059

↗
carter (1998)

Effective composition instruction: What does the research show

Center Commun Sci Technol Manage Pub Ser
Rezaei et al. (2010)

Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing

Assessing Writing
10.18260/1-2--31067

↗
10.1515/9783110255492.331

↗
10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494188

↗
10.1080/02702710500400495

↗
10.1111/j.1745-3984.1969.tb00665.x

↗
10.3102/00028312003002125

↗
10.18260/1-2--33079

↗
10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494208

↗
ford (2006)

The right answer is communication when capstone engineering courses drive the questions

J Sci Technol Eng Math Educ
10.1109/FIE.2001.963905

↗
(0)
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00043.x

↗
Reave (2004)

Technical Communication Instruction in Engineering Schools: A Survey of Top-Ran…

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00995.x

↗
10.1080/00221300209602029

↗
10.1187/cbe.cbe-14-03-0054

↗
brookhart (2015)

How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Student
10.1007/s11192-017-2609-2

↗
10.1177/1049732319889354

↗
10.1177/1077699017736040

↗
10.1515/lingvan-2015-0011

↗
10.1080/15332861.2012.650988

↗
10.1080/87567555.2011.633287

↗
10.18260/1-2--29159

↗
ambrose (2010)

How Learning Works Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching
10.18260/1-2--28932

↗
10.1115/1.4042081

↗
10.1177/073953291103200205

↗
10.12735/ier.v2i3p18

↗
10.18260/1-2?8621

↗
10.18260/1-2--22315

↗
Norback et al. (2010)

Integrating an Executive Panel on Communication info an Engineering Curriculum

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Martin-Lacroux et al. (2017)

Do Employers Forgive Applicants’ Bad Spelling in Résumés?

Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
CHARNEY et al. (1992)

How Writing Quality Influences Readers' Judgments of Résumés in Business and En…

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
10.4135/9781452218649.n8

↗
fleiss (1981)

Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
10.1080/0969594X.2019.1593105

↗
10.3200/JRLP.139.5.401-412

↗
10.1080/00029238.1971.11080840

↗
mcevoy (2016)

Loss aversion and student achievement

Economics Bulletin
10.1037/h0026256

↗
docan (2006)

Positive and negative incentives in the classroom: An analysis of grading systems and stu…

Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
10.13140/2.1.1828.6084

↗
meyer (2022)

vcd: Visualizing categorical data
10.1002/jee.20161

↗
bryer (2016)

Likert: Analysis and visualization likert items
10.1201/b17434

↗
10.18260/1-2--32061

↗
10.1177/1098214005283748

↗
10.2307/1914185

↗
10.4300/JGME-5-4-18

↗
faulk (2019)

Influencing positive student behavior using the endowment effect

E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching
anwar (1999)

Teaching technical communications to get students: A case study approach paper

Proc Amer Soc Eng Educ Annu Conf
10.1109/FIE.2001.963905

↗
biswas (2021)

Improve technical communication using scaffolding method in mechanical engineering courses

Proc Fall Amer Soc Eng Educ Middle Atlantic Sect Meeting
10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y

↗
10.1214/aos/1176344552

↗
10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

The Communication Coefficient Method: A New Faculty Grading Tool Designed to Help Engineering Students Improve Their Technical Communication

Abstract

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

References (80) · 8 in this index

Related articles