IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Sep 2024

University–Industry Collaboration in Managing Translation Projects: Perceptions and Responses From Students, Instructors, and Industry Partners

Daqin Cao Xi'an International Studies University ; Jianfen Chen ; Shijie Liu

Abstract

About the case: This case study examines how students, instructors, and industry partners in university and industry collaborative translation projects perceive and respond to their experiences with these projects. It reports on collaborative translation projects at Xi'an International Studies University, involving the active participation of three stakeholders. Situating the case: Translation and technical and professional communication (TPC) education both prioritize cultivating students’ practical skills of producing audience-centered content. They both value collaborative approaches as effective methods for bridging the gap between academia and industry. Although TPC education aims to foster students’ technical and professional writing competence and prepare them for industry demands, translation education focuses on developing students’ translation competence through context-dependent learning. Various models have been proposed to define translation competence, with the multicomponent model being the most prominent. This model emphasizes multiple skills and attributes that translators need, reflecting the influence of market demands and technological advancements. Collaborative approaches like project-based learning (PjBL) have been advocated to bridge the gap between academia and industry. However, research at the program level and from stakeholders’ perspectives remains limited. Methods: We adopted a mixed-method strategy and employed surveys and one-on-one interviews to examine the responses from the stakeholders about their experiences and the impacts of the collaborative translation projects. Results: Statistical analysis of the surveys and thematic analysis of interviews and open-ended questions indicate that all stakeholders concur with the projects’ benefits in enhancing students’ translation competence and shortening the gap between classroom translation education and market demands. Despite these benefits, all stakeholders face various challenges that should be addressed by expanding the scalability and sustainability of collaborative projects, fostering closer and direct collaboration between instructors and industry partners, and enhancing the ethics of professional code and strategic competence of students. Conclusion: Based on the research results, we suggest further research directed at the sustainability of these projects and the scalability of their benefits toward a bigger population of students.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2024.3411922
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Liu (2026)
    Bridging the Gap: A Comparative Study of Students’ and LSPs’ Perceptions of Tra…
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (56) · 4 in this index

  1. 10.18778/1731-7533.18.2.02
     ↗
  2. 10.4018/978-1-4666-6615-3.ch009
     ↗
  3. Buysschaert (2018)
    Embracing digital disruption in translator training: Technology immersion in simulated tr…
    Tradumtica: Tecnol. Traducci  ↗
  4. Paradowska (2021)
    Benefits and challenges of an intra-university authentic collaborative translation project
    New Voices Transl. Studies
  5. 10.3390/su14063140
     ↗
Show all 56 →
  1. 10.1075/btl.54
     ↗
  2. 10.1109/ICEED.2016.7856066
     ↗
  3. 10.1007/978-981-16-8329-9_17
     ↗
  4. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.315
     ↗
  5. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.784
     ↗
  6. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.753
     ↗
  7. Starke-Meyerring et al. (2007)
    Global Partnerships: Positioning Technical Communication Programs in the Contex…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  8. Crabtree (2005)
    Technical communication, participatory action research, and global civic engagement: A te…
    Reflections
  9. 10.1163/9789087904753_005
     ↗
  10. Karlson (1991)
    Writing training: Collaboration between academy and government agency
    Tech. Commun.
  11. Painter (1991)
    Collaboration between business and academia
    Tech. Commun.
  12. Bosley (1995)
    Collaborative partnerships: Academia and industry working together
    Tech. Commun.
  13. Newmark (2012)
    An academic e-journal as technical communication client project: Enculturation, productio…
    Tech. Commun.
  14. Jennings (2012)
    Technical communication practitioner-student interaction: An opportunity for students to …
    Tech. Commun.
  15. 10.4018/IJSKD.2016070103
     ↗
  16. Ballard (2018)
    Cross-disciplinary perspectives on technical communication: STEM faculty as stakeholders …
    Programmatic Perspectives
  17. Schreiber (2018)
    Revisiting the service course to map out the future of the field
    Programmatic Perspectives
  18. Bourelle (2014)
    Adapting Service-Learning into the Online Technical Communication Classroom: A …
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  19. Batova (2021)
    An Approach for Incorporating Community-Engaged Learning in Intensive Online Cl…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  20. Scott (2008)
    The Practice of Usability: Teaching User Engagement Through Service-Learning
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  21. Hill Duin (2021)
    The rhetoric, science, and technology of 21st century collaboration
  22. 10.1080/14703297.2010.518423
     ↗
  23. 10.1080/03043797.2013.833170
     ↗
  24. 10.1080/02615479.2014.935731
     ↗
  25. 10.1080/13562517.2017.1421628
     ↗
  26. 10.1080/03043797.2016.1189880
     ↗
  27. 10.1177/1053825917750407
     ↗
  28. 10.1177/1077695816686440
     ↗
  29. 10.1080/02602938.2015.1048505
     ↗
  30. 10.4018/978-1-5225-4154-7.ch009
     ↗
  31. 10.1080/1750399x.2018.1564542
     ↗
  32. 10.1080/1750399x.2023.2237837
     ↗
  33. 10.1007/s10758-023-09679-1
     ↗
  34. 10.1080/1750399X.2022.2101849
     ↗
  35. 10.7202/008533ar
     ↗
  36. 10.7202/002190ar
     ↗
  37. 10.1075/btl
     ↗
  38. 10.1075/target.8.2.07cao
     ↗
  39. 10.4324/9781315760186
     ↗
  40. 10.4324/9781315760292
     ↗
  41. Gpferich (2009)
    Towards a model of translation competence and its acquisition
  42. 10.1080/1750399x.2021.2017706
     ↗
  43. 10.1080/1750399X.2022.2082813
     ↗
  44. Cao (2017)
    Project-driven training mode for patent translators in the era of internet plus
    Shanghai J. Translators
  45. Wang (2022)
    Research on machine translation post-editing competence in the era of artificial intelligence
    Chin. Sci. Technol. Translators J.
  46. Chambliss (2019)
    Making Sense of the Social World: Methods of Investigation
  47. 10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
     ↗
  48. 10.1037/1099-9809.10.1.66
     ↗
  49. (2020)
    NVivo,
  50. 10.1177/1609406917733847
     ↗
  51. Lancaster (2022)
    Collaboration models for programmatic development: Stakeholder engagement in program desi…
    Programmatic Perspectives
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Written Communication Mar 2026
    Faculty and Administrator Perceptions of Interdisciplinary Collaborative Writing: Practices, Challenges, and Support Structures ↗
    Stephen Carradini; Ed Nagelhout
    collaborative writing professional writing labor and working conditions qualitative research
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Oct 2025
    Relational Realities of Readiness: What Managers Wish Colleges Knew About Business Communication ↗
    Laura Nicole Miller; Karen McCullough
    collaborative writing professional writing qualitative research disability studies
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Oct 2025
    The Evaporating Cloud as a Business Communication Tool: A Systematic Framework for Conflict Analysis and Persuasive Compositions in the Workplace ↗
    Mahesh C. Gupta; Annika Reitenga; Christina Davidson
    collaborative writing professional writing qualitative research
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Jun 2025
    Reimagining Communication Pedagogy for Virtual Workplaces: Work-From-Home Study Implications ↗
    Manoj Kumar Mishra; Amarnath Padhi; Deepika Sharma; Uday Sharma
    writing pedagogy collaborative writing professional writing qualitative research
  5. Communication Design Quarterly Sep 2024
    Collaboration as a Shared Value: Instructor and Student Perceptions of Collaborative Learning in Online Business Writing Courses ↗
    Brigitte Mussack; Jason Tham
    writing pedagogy collaborative writing professional writing qualitative research