IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2025

The Impact of Linguistic Accommodation on Transactional and Relational Goals in Business Communication

Ya Sun University of International Business and Economics ; Pan Zheng University of International Business and Economics ; Na Zhang University of International Business and Economics

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Introduction:</b> Efficient and effective business communication depends on appropriate communication adjustments that are at the core of communication accommodation theory. This theory has been used to explore the role of communication accommodation in driving business performance and organizational success. However, there has been no systematic survey of linguistic accommodation in business communication. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Research questions:</b> 1. What are general characteristics of studies on the impact of linguistic accommodation in business communication? 2. What are the foci of linguistic accommodation in business communication? 3. What are the contexts, participants (actors and targets), transactional goals, and relational goals of linguistic accommodation in business communication? <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Methodology:</b> We conducted an integrative literature review based on journal articles from the database Web of Science Core Collection. After retrieving 32 articles corresponding to our research purpose, we conducted a qualitative content analysis to describe general characteristics of these articles and identify foci of linguistic accommodation, contexts, participants (actors and targets), transactional goals, and relational goals of linguistic accommodation. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results and conclusions:</b> In both external and internal business communication, actors tend to accommodate or nonaccommodate targets by choosing different languages and communication styles on different linguistic levels based on their language proficiency. We found that linguistic accommodation generally has a positive impact on transactional goals (such as service quality perceptions, negotiation effectiveness, and group performance) and relational goals (such as brand trust, consumer engagement, and cooperation intentions). This review may help business professionals adopt appropriate linguistic accommodation strategies to achieve transactional or relational goals, and aid teachers of business communication in developing students’ accommodation competence.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2025.3541984
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (60) · 4 in this index

  1. 10.1515/9780748631834-030
     ↗
  2. 10.4324/9781003195511-12
     ↗
  3. 10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101571
     ↗
  4. 10.1108/jsm-12-2020-0541
     ↗
  5. Gasiorek (2016)
    Theoretical perspctive on interpersonal adjustment in language and communication
     ↗
Show all 60 →
  1. Carradini (2020)
    A Comparison of Research Topics Associated With Technical Communication, Busine…
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. 10.1177/2329488416675841
     ↗
  3. 10.1177/002194360003700102
     ↗
  4. 10.1177/0021943610377304
     ↗
  5. Williamson (2022)
    Participation Styles, Turn-Taking Strategies, and Marginalization in Intercultu…
    Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  6. 10.1080/07256860305789
     ↗
  7. 10.1177/108056990306600308
     ↗
  8. Sun et al. (2022)
    Corporations' Owned Social Media Narrative
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  9. Gallagher et al. (2023)
    The State of UX Pedagogy
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  10. 10.1177/1534484305278283
     ↗
  11. (2024)
    Web of science core collection
  12. 10.4324/9781003080688
     ↗
  13. 10.1007/s11192-024-04997-2
     ↗
  14. 10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5_2
     ↗
  15. 10.1016/j.intman.2020.100809
     ↗
  16. 10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101068
     ↗
  17. Bryman (2012)
    Social Research Methods
  18. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.10.012
     ↗
  19. 10.1515/mult.2009.016
     ↗
  20. 10.1504/EJIM.2018.092839
     ↗
  21. Creswell (2013)
    Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches
  22. 10.1108/IJCMA-08-2020-0137
     ↗
  23. 10.1080/01434632.2013.807270
     ↗
  24. 10.1108/JOSM-12-2016-0325
     ↗
  25. 10.1177/0261927X15575772
     ↗
  26. 10.1080/09585192.2011.561240
     ↗
  27. Spolsky (2004)
    Language Policy
  28. 10.1108/03090561311324327
     ↗
  29. 10.1111/weng.12097
     ↗
  30. 10.2989/16073614.2014.999993
     ↗
  31. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.012
     ↗
  32. 10.1177/0261927X221128991
     ↗
  33. 10.1080/03637751.2023.2213305
     ↗
  34. 10.1515/iprg.2011.010
     ↗
  35. 10.1108/JPBM-05-2013-0299
     ↗
  36. 10.1287/isre.1040.0023
     ↗
  37. 10.1075/eww.38.3.01cow
     ↗
  38. 10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.4.12
     ↗
  39. 10.1177/0261927X16663254
     ↗
  40. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.07.015
     ↗
  41. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.012
     ↗
  42. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103511
     ↗
  43. 10.1108/JSM-07-2022-0245
     ↗
  44. 10.1177/0018726713481069
     ↗
  45. 10.1515/flin-2023-2018
     ↗
  46. 10.1080/02650487.2008.11073056
     ↗
  47. 10.1057/s41267-023-00639-6
     ↗
  48. 10.1080/13670050.2015.1037719
     ↗
  49. 10.1007/s00168-020-01004-3
     ↗
  50. Littlejohn (2005)
    Theories of Human Communication
  51. 10.1080/23808985.2014.11679160
     ↗
  52. 10.1017/CBO9781316226537.004
     ↗
  53. 10.1177/0261927x231167108
     ↗
  54. 10.1080/09296174.2020.1807853
     ↗
  55. 10.1093/jcmc/zmab001
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Aug 2026
    Managers’ Perceptions of Gen Z’s Communication Readiness ↗
    Karen McCullough; Laura Nicole Miller
    curriculum design professional writing qualitative research disability studies
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication Jun 2026
    Developing an Accessibility Mindset: Examining How Organizational Policies and Practices Erase Disabled Employees’ Rights Under the Americans With Disabilities Act ↗
    Heidi Willers; Mark A. Hannah; Sangeet Bhalla
    professional writing qualitative research disability studies
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Mar 2026
    Teaching Radical Love: Implementing Critical Positive Communication Pedagogy in the Classroom ↗
    Vincent Russell; Grace Cheshire; Gabriel Wisnewski-Parks
    writing pedagogy teacher development professional writing race and writing gender and writing disability studies
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Oct 2025
    Relational Realities of Readiness: What Managers Wish Colleges Knew About Business Communication ↗
    Laura Nicole Miller; Karen McCullough
    collaborative writing professional writing qualitative research disability studies
  5. Pedagogy Oct 2025
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy advanced composition creative writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions archival research multimodality artificial intelligence literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies literary studies editorial matter