Argumentation Nov 1995

Fallacies in two objections to Kant's first defense of the duty of beneficence in the Grundlegung

John E. Atwell Temple University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
1995-11-01
DOI
10.1007/bf00737783
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (14)

  1. Allison, H.E.: 1993, ?Kant's Doctrine of Obligatory Ends?, read at several institutions in recent years, wher…
  2. J.E. Atwell (1974)
    Atwell, J.E.: 1974, ?Objective Ends in Kant's Ethics?,Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 562(2), 156?171.
    Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
  3. J.E. Atwell (1986)
    Ends and Principles in Kant's Moral Thought
     ↗
  4. B. Aune (1988)
    Moral Philosophy: Historical and Contemporary Essays
  5. Baron, M.: 1987, ?Kantian Ethics and Supererogation?,The Journal of Philosophy 84.
     ↗
Show all 14 →
  1. W.K. Frankena (1973)
    Ethics
  2. Gewirth, A.: 1991, ?Can Any Final Ends Be Rational??,Ethics 102(1).
     ↗
  3. Kant, I.:Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (Gr.), Academy edition, vol. IV.
  4. Kant, I.:Metaphysik der Sitten (MdS), Academy edition, vol. VI.
  5. O. Nell (O'Neill) (1975)
    Acting on Principle: An Essay in Kantian Ethics
  6. O. O'Neill (1989)
    Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy
  7. N. Potter (1985)
    Potter, N.: 1985, ?Kant on Ends that are at the Same Time Duties?,Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 66, 78?82.
    Pacific Philosophical Quarterly  ↗
  8. H. Sidgwick (1981)
    The Methods of Ethics
  9. Wood, A.W.: 1992, Review of O'Neill'sConstructions of Reason, The Philosophical Review (July), 647-50.
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →