Message Framing, Normative Advocacy and Persuasive Success

Adam Corner Cardiff University ; Ulrike Hahn Cardiff University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2010-05-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-009-9159-6
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (34) · 2 in this index

  1. A primer of probability logic
  2. Corner, A., U. Hahn, and M. Oaksford. 2006. The Slippery slope argument: Probability, utility and category bo…
  3. Studies in the way of words
  4. Hahn, U., and M. Oaksford. 2006a. A Bayesian approach to informal reasoning fallacies. Synthese 152 (2): 207–237.
    Synthese  ↗
  5. Hahn, U., and M. Oaksford. 2006b. Why a normative theory of argument strength and why might one want it to be…
    Informal Logic  ↗
Show all 34 →
  1. Hahn, U., and M. Oaksford. 2007. The rationality of informal argumentation: A Bayesian approach to reasoning …
    Psychological Review  ↗
  2. Argumentation
  3. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases
     ↗
  4. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision making under risk. Econometrica …
    Econometrica  ↗
  5. Kuhberger, A. 1998. The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and…
    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes  ↗
  6. Levin, I.P., S.L. Schneider, and G.J. Gaeth. 1998. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical …
    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes  ↗
  7. McKenzie, C.R.M., and J.D. Nelson. 2003. What a speaker’s choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame se…
    Psychonomic Bulletin and Review  ↗
  8. Mckenzie, C.R.M., M. Liersch, and R. Finklestein. 2006. Recommendations implicit in policy defaults. Psycholo…
    Psychological Science  ↗
  9. Moxey, A., D. O’Connell, P. McGettigan, and D. Henry. 2003. Describing treatment effects to patients: How the…
    Journal of General Internal Medicine  ↗
  10. Oaksford, M., and N. Chater. 1994. A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psych…
    Psychological Review  ↗
  11. Proceedings of the third ISSA conference on argumentation, vol. 1: Perspectives and approaches
  12. O’Keefe, D.J. 1997a. Standpoint explicitness and persuasive effect: A meta-analytic review of the effects of …
    Argumentation and Advocacy  ↗
  13. O’Keefe, D.J. 1997b. Justification explicitness and persuasive effect: A meta-analytic review of the effects …
    Argumentation and Advocacy  ↗
  14. Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation
  15. Selected papers from the thirteenth NCA/AFA conference on argumentation
  16. Argumentation
  17. O’Keefe, D.J., and J.D. Jensen. 2007. The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for…
    Journal of Health Communication  ↗
  18. Priester, J.R., and R.E. Petty. 1995. Source attributions and persuasion: perceived honesty as a determinant …
    Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin  ↗
  19. Rothman, A.J., R.D. Bartels, J. Wlaschin, and P. Salovey. 2006. The strategic use of gain-and loss-framed mes…
    Journal of Communication  ↗
  20. Rothman, A.J., and P. Salovey. 1997. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behaviour: The role of message f…
    Psychological Bulletin  ↗
  21. Semin, G.R., and C.J. De Poot. 1997. Bringing partiality to light: Question wording and choice as indicators …
    Social Cognition  ↗
  22. Sher, S., and C.R.M. McKenzie. 2006. Information leakage from logically equivalent frames. Cognition 101: 467–494.
    Cognition  ↗
  23. The encyclopedia of language and linguistics
  24. Stalnaker, R. 1975. Indicative conditionals. Philosophia 5: 269–286.
    Philosophia  ↗
  25. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211 (4481)…
    Science  ↗
  26. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1986. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business 59: 251–278.
    Journal of Business  ↗
  27. A systematic theory of argumentation—the pragma-dialectical approach
  28. Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation
     ↗
  29. Argument: The logic of the fallacies