Argumentation May 2010

What is the Reason for This Rule? An Inferential Account of the Ratio Legis

Damiano Canale Bocconi University ; Giovanni Tuzet Bocconi University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2010-05-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-009-9171-x
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (43) · 4 in this index

  1. R Alexy (1983)
    Theorie der juristischen Argumentation, Die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie …
  2. (1991)
    Controversies about law’s ontology
  3. A Barak (2005)
    Purposive interpretation in law
     ↗
  4. Bobbio, N. 2006 [1938]. L’analogia nella logica del diritto, ed. P. Di Lucia. Turin: Giappichelli.
  5. Bobbio, N. 1994. Contributi ad un dizionario giuridico. Turin: Giappichelli.
Show all 43 →
  1. RB Brandom (1994)
    Making it explicit. Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment
  2. RB Brandom (2008)
    Between saying and doing. Towards an analytic pragmatism
     ↗
  3. S Brewer (1996)
    Brewer, S. 1996. Exemplary reasoning: Semantics, pragmatics, and the rational force of legal argument by anal…
    Harvard Law Review  ↗
  4. D Canale (2008)
    Canale, D., and G. Tuzet. 2008. On the contrary. Inferential analysis and ontological assumptions of the a co…
    Informal Logic  ↗
  5. D Canale (2009)
    Canale, D., and G. Tuzet. 2009. The a simili argument: An inferentialist setting. Ratio Juris 22: 499–509.
    Ratio Juris  ↗
  6. Davidson, D. 1980 [1963]. Actions, reasons and causes. In Essays on action and events, 3–19. Oxford: Oxford U…
     ↗
  7. R Dworkin (1996)
    Dworkin, R. 1996. Objectivity and truth: You’d better believe it. Philosophy & Public Affairs 25: 87–139.
    Philosophy & Public Affairs  ↗
  8. PO Ekelöf (1958)
    Scandinavian studies in law
  9. TAO Endicott (2000)
    Vagueness in law
     ↗
  10. Feteris (2005)
    The Rational Reconstruction of Argumentation Referring to Consequences and Purp…
    Argumentation
  11. Feteris (2008)
    Strategic Maneuvering with the Intention of the Legislator in the Justification…
    Argumentation
  12. MH Fisch (1942)
    Fisch, M.H. 1942. Justice Holmes, the prediction theory of law, and pragmatism. The Journal of Philosophy 39:…
    The Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  13. J Goldsworthy (2005)
    Goldsworthy, J. 2005. Legislative intentions, legislative supremacy, and legal positivism. San Diego Law Revi…
    San Diego Law Review
  14. Guastini, R. 1993. Le fonti del diritto e l’interpretazione. Milan: Giuffrè.
  15. Hage (2005)
    The Logic of Analogy in the Law
    Argumentation
  16. HLA Hart (1994)
    The concept of law (1st ed. 1961)
  17. KJ Holyoak (1995)
    Mental Leaps. Analogy in creative thought
  18. Kloosterhuis (2005)
    Reconstructing Complex Analogy Argumentation in Judicial Decisions: A Pragma-Di…
    Argumentation
  19. K Larenz (1975)
    Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft
     ↗
  20. KN Llewellyn (1950)
    Llewellyn, K.N. 1950. Remarks on the theory of appellate decision and the rules or canons about how statutes …
    Vanderbilt Law Review
  21. DN MacCormick (1991)
    Interpreting statutes. A comparative study
  22. MacCormick, D.N., and O. Weinberger. 1986. An institutional theory of law: new approaches to legal positivism…
     ↗
  23. A Marmor (2001)
    Positive law and objective values
     ↗
  24. SM McJohn (1993)
    McJohn, S.M. 1993. On Uberty: Legal reasoning by analogy and peirce’s theory of abduction. Willamette Law Rev…
    Willamette Law Review
  25. JD Miller (1975)
    Miller, J.D. 1975. Holmes, peirce and legal pragmatism. The Yale Law Journal 84: 1123–1140.
    The Yale Law Journal  ↗
  26. A Peczenik (2000)
    Peczenik, A., and J. Hage. 2000. Legal knowledge about what? Ratio Juris 13: 326–345.
    Ratio Juris  ↗
  27. M Radin (1930)
    Radin, M. 1930. Statutory interpretation. Harvard Law Review 43: 863–885.
    Harvard Law Review  ↗
  28. M Radin (1942)
    Radin, M. 1942. A short way with statutes. Harvard Law Review 56: 388–426.
    Harvard Law Review  ↗
  29. J Searle (1995)
    The construction of social reality
  30. Summers, R.S. 1991. Statutory interpretation in the United States, MacCormick and Summers, 407–459.
  31. Summers, R.S., and M. Taruffo. 1991. Interpretation and comparative analysis, MacCormick and Summers, 461–510.
  32. C Sunstein (1993)
    Sunstein, C. 1993. On analogical reasoning. Harvard Law Review 106: 741–791.
    Harvard Law Review  ↗
  33. B Tamanaha (2006)
    Law as a means to an end: Threat to the rule of law
     ↗
  34. G Tuzet (2007)
    Analisi e diritto
  35. (2000)
    Significato letterale e interpretazione del diritto
  36. V Velluzzi (2002)
    Interpretazione sistematica e prassi giurisprudenziale
  37. F Waismann (1945)
    Waismann, F. 1945. “Verifiability”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 19: 119–150.
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
  38. LL Weinreb (2005)
    Legal reason. The use of analogy in legal argument
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network → Build reading path →