Journal
Argumentation
Published
2011-08-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-011-9226-7
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation

References (41) · 1 in this index

  1. Cain, D., G. Loewenstein, and D.A. Moore. 2005. The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conf…
    Journal of Legal Studies  ↗
  2. CERACT 2008. Committee on education, research and appraisal of the consequences of technology, March 3rd, 200…
  3. Rationality for mortals: How people cope with uncertainty
     ↗
  4. Gigerenzer, G., and H. Brighton. 2009. Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in C…
    Topics in Cognitive Science  ↗
  5. Godden, D.M., and D. Walton. 2006. Argument from expert opinion as legal evidence: Critical questions and adm…
    Ratio Juris  ↗
Show all 41 →
  1. Knowledge in a social world
     ↗
  2. Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation: An examination of Douglas Walton’s theories of re…
  3. Goodwin, J., and L. Honeycutt. 2010. When science goes public: From technical arguments to appeals to authori…
    Studies in Communication Sciences
  4. Continental philosophy of science
     ↗
  5. Hahn, U., and M. Oaskford. 2006. A Bayesian approach to informal reasoning fallacies. Synthese 152: 207–223.
    Synthese  ↗
  6. Hahn, U., A.J.L. Harris, and A. Corner. 2009. Argument content and argument source: An exploration. Informal …
    Informal Logic  ↗
  7. Fallacies
  8. Argumentation
  9. Koch, C., and C. Schmidt. 2010. Disclosing conflicts of interest—Do experience and reputation matter? Account…
    Accounting, Organizations and Society  ↗
  10. Li, M., and K. Madarás. 2008. When mandatory disclosure hurts: Expert advice and conflicting interests. Journ…
    Journal of Economic Theory  ↗
  11. Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and Practice
  12. Locke, J. 1975 (1690). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. P.H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Mansbridge, J.J. 1990. Preface. In Beyond self-interest, ed. J.J. Mansbridge, ix–xiii. Chicago, ILL: Chicago …
  14. Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral an…
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences  ↗
  15. The next phase of business ethics: Integrating psychology and ethics, vol. 3
     ↗
  16. Mosley, A. 2005. Egoism. In The internet encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. J. Fieser and B. Dowden. http://www.…
  17. Oaksford, M., and N. Charter. 2009. Précis of Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reaso…
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences  ↗
  18. Patterson, M.R. 1999. Conflicts of interest in scientific expert testimony. William and Mary Law Review 40(4)…
    William and Mary Law Review
  19. Cognitive carpentry
     ↗
  20. Virtue of selfishness
  21. Cogent science in context. The science wars, argumentation theory and Habermas
  22. European review of social psychology, vol. 3
  23. Sen, A.K. 1977. Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy & Pub…
    Philosophy & Public Affairs
  24. Simon, H.A. 1956. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review 63(2): 129–138.
    Psychological Review  ↗
  25. Simon, H.A. 1985. The dialogue of psychology with political science. The American Political Science Review 79…
    The American Political Science Review  ↗
  26. Šorm, E. 2010. The good, the bad and the persuasive: Normative quality and actual persuasiveness of arguments…
  27. Tocqueville, A. de. 1889. Democracy in America. London: Longman, Greens & Co.
  28. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective
  29. Fundamentals of argumentation theory
  30. Appeal to expert opinion: Arguments from authority
  31. Legal argumentation and evidence
  32. Walton, D.N. 2011. Arguments, types of. In: Internet encyclopedia. http://science.jrank.org/pages/20958/argum…
  33. Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation, ch. 16
  34. Woods, J., and D. Walton. 1974. Argumentum ad verecundiam. Philosophy and Rhetoric 7: 135–153.
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  35. Zenker, F. 2010. Analyzing social policy argumentation: A case study on the opinion of the German National Et…
    Informal Logic  ↗
  36. Zenker, F. 2011. Deduction, induction, conduction: An attempt at unifying natural language argument structure…