Legal Audiences

Fábio Perin Shecaira Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro ; Noel Struchiner Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2018-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-017-9446-6
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (34) · 3 in this index

  1. Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of the Legal Order
  2. Batson, C.Daniel, Tricia Klein, Lori Highberger, and Laura Shaw. 1995. Immorality From Empathy-Induced Altrui…
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  ↗
  3. Judges and their Audiences. A Perspective on Judicial Behavior
     ↗
  4. Black, Ryan, Ryan Owens, Justin Wedeking, and Patrick Wohlfarth. 2016. The Influence of Public Sentiment on S…
    Law and Society Review  ↗
  5. The Notion of an Ideal Audience in Legal Argument
     ↗
Show all 34 →
  1. The Rhetoric of Reason
  2. da Silva, Virgilio Afonso. 2013. Deciding without Deliberating. I-Con 11: 557–584.
    I-Con
  3. da Silva, Virgilio Afonso. 2015. De Quem Divergem os Divergentes: os Votos Vencidos no Supremo Tribunal Feder…
    Direito, Estado e Sociedade
  4. Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation
     ↗
  5. Practical Reasoning in Human Affairs: Studies in Honor of Chaim Perelman
     ↗
  6. Fuller, Lon. 1958. Positivism and Fidelity to Law. Harvard Law Review 71: 630–672.
    Harvard Law Review  ↗
  7. Law as a Leap of Faith
     ↗
  8. George, Tracey, and Mitu Gulati. 2016. Courts of Good and Ill Repute: Garoupa and Ginsburg’s Judicial Reputat…
    University of Chicago Law Review
  9. Goutal, Jean Louis. 1976. Characteristics of Judicial Style in France, Britain and the USA. American Journal …
    American Journal of Comparative Law  ↗
  10. Essays on Bentham. Jurisprudence and Political Theory
     ↗
  11. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  12. Comparative and Private International Law: Essays in Honor of John Henry Merryman
  13. Judicial Deliberations. A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy
     ↗
  14. Leiter, Brian. 2009. Explaining Theoretical Disagreement. University of Chicago Law Review 76: 1215–1250.
    University of Chicago Law Review
  15. MacCormick, Neil. 1993. Argumentation and Interpretation in Law. Ratio Juris 6: 16–29.
    Ratio Juris  ↗
  16. Markesinis, Basil. 2000. Judicial Style and Judicial Reasoning in England and Germany. Cambridge Law Journal …
    Cambridge Law Journal  ↗
  17. The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America
     ↗
  18. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  19. The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and its Applications
     ↗
  20. Justice, Law, and Argument: Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning
     ↗
  21. Pizarro, D.A., E. Uhlmann, and P. Bloom. 2003. Causal Deviance and the Attribution of Moral Responsibility. J…
    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology  ↗
  22. How Judges Think
  23. Ethics in the Public Domain
  24. Thinking like a Lawyer
     ↗
  25. Shecaira, Fábio Perin. 2015. Sources of law are not legal norms. Ratio Juris 28(1): 15–30.
    Ratio Juris  ↗
  26. Shecaira, Fábio Perin. 2017. Legal arguments from scholarly authority. Ratio Juris 30(3): 305–321.
    Ratio Juris  ↗
  27. Rhetorical Argumentation. Principles of Theory and Practice
     ↗
  28. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  29. Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation
     ↗