Argumentation Dec 2020

No Place for Compromise: Resisting the Shift to Negotiation

David Godden Michigan State University ; John Casey Northeastern Illinois University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2020-12-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-020-09517-z
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Laar (2024)
    Conversational Integrity: Argument, Commitment, and Compromise
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Castro (2023)
    Negotiation as Practical Argumentation
    Argumentation
  3. Aikin et al. (2022)
    Fallacies of Meta-argumentation
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  4. Aikin et al. (2022)
    Bothsiderism
    Argumentation

References (30) · 3 in this index

  1. A Alschuler (1968)
    Alschuler, A. 1968. The prosecutor’s role in plea bargaining. University of Chicago Law Review 36: 50–112.
    University of Chicago Law Review  ↗
  2. American Bar Association. 2015. Criminal justice standards for the prosecution function. https://www.american…
  3. M Benjamin (1990)
    Splitting the difference: Compromise and integrity in ethics and politics
  4. Clifford, W.K. 1877. The ethics of belief. Contemporary Review 29: 289–309. Reprinted in: 1886. William K. Cl…
  5. Dean, J. https://verdict.justia.com/2013/01/25/dealing-with-aaron-swartz-in-the-nixonian-tradition. Jan 25 2013.
Show all 30 →
  1. Godden, D. 2016. Commentary on Jan Albert van Laar and Erik C.W. Krabbe ‘‘Splitting a difference of opinion.’…
  2. D Godden (2010)
    Godden, D. 2010. The importance of belief in argumentation: Belief, commitment and the effective resolution o…
    Synthese  ↗
  3. K Graham (2014)
    Graham, K. 2014. Overcharging. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 11 (2): 201–724.
    Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law
  4. D Hample (2012)
    Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies, Argumentation Library
     ↗
  5. In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 364 (1970).
  6. Paglieri, F. 2009. Ruinous arguments: Escalation of disagreement and the dangers of arguing. In: Argument Cul…
  7. F Paglieri (2010)
    Paglieri, F., and C. Castelfranchi. 2010. Why argue? Towards a cost–benefit analysis of argumentation. Argume…
    Argument and Computation  ↗
  8. S Schulhofer (1992)
    Schulhofer, S. 1992. Plea bargaining as disaster. The Yale Law Journal 101 (8): 1979–2009.
    The Yale Law Journal  ↗
  9. K Stevens (2019)
    Stevens, K. 2019. The roles we make others take: Thoughts on the ethics of arguing. Topoi 38 (4): 693–709.
    Topoi  ↗
  10. TINDALE (1997)
    Fallacies, Blunders, and Dialogue Shifts: Walton‘s Contributions to the Fallacy…
    Argumentation
  11. FH van Eemeren (2004)
    A systematic theory of argumentation
  12. van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical Model f…
     ↗
  13. JA van Laar (2019)
    Studies in critical thinking
  14. van Laar, J.A., and E.C.W. Krabbe. 2016a. Splitting a difference of opinion. In Argumentation, Objectivity, a…
  15. van Laar, J.A., and E.C.W. Krabbe. 2016b. Reply to David Godden’s commentary on ‘‘Splitting a difference of o…
  16. Laar et al. (2018)
    Splitting a Difference of Opinion: The Shift to Negotiation
    Argumentation
  17. Laar et al. (2018)
    The Role of Argument in Negotiation
    Argumentation
  18. JA van Laar (2019)
    van Laar, J.A., and E.C.W. Krabbe. 2019a. Criticism and justification of negotiated compromises: The 2015 Par…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  ↗
  19. van Laar, J.A., and E.C.W. Krabbe. 2019b. Pressure and argumentation in public controversies. In Proceedings …
  20. D Walton (1992)
    Argumentation illuminated
  21. D Walton (1998)
    The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument
     ↗
  22. D Walton (1995)
    Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning
  23. D Walton (2008)
    Argumentation schemes
     ↗
  24. D Weinstock (2013)
    Weinstock, D. 2013. On the possibility of principled moral compromise. Critical Review of International Socia…
    Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy  ↗
  25. R Wright (2002)
    Wright, R., and M. Miller. 2002. The screening/bargaining tradeoff. Stanford Law Review 55 (1): 29–118.
    Stanford Law Review  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network → Build reading path →