Getting Out in Front of the Owl of Minerva Problem

David Godden Michigan State University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2022-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-021-09554-2
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric

References (30) · 2 in this index

  1. Argumentation
  2. Aikin, S. 2018. Deep disagreement and the problem of the criterion. Topoi. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018…
     ↗
  3. Aikin, S. 2019. Deep disagreement, the dark enlightenment, and the rhetoric of the red pill. Journal of Appli…
    Journal of Applied Philosophy  ↗
  4. Aikin, S. 2020. The Owl of Minerva problem. Southwest Philosophical Review 36 (1): 13–22.
    Southwest Philosophical Review  ↗
  5. Aikin, S. and Talisse, R. 2017a. Democracy, deliberation, and the Owl of Minerva problem: The malaise of argu…
Show all 30 →
  1. Aikin, S. and Talisse, R. 2017b. The Owl of Minerva problem. 3 Quarks Daily: Science, Arts, Philosophy, Polit…
  2. Aikin, S and Talisse, R. 2018. The Owl of Minerva and the fallacy fallacy. 3 Quarks Daily: Science, Arts, Phi…
  3. Why we argue (and how we should): A guide to political disagreement in an age of unreason
  4. Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions
  5. Making it explicit
  6. Aspiration: The agency of becoming
     ↗
  7. Campolo, C. 2019. On staying in character: Virtue and the possibility of deep disagreement. Topoi 38 (4): 719–723.
    Topoi  ↗
  8. Godden, D. 2014. Teaching rational entitlement and responsibility: A Socratic exercise. Informal Logic 34 (1)…
    Informal Logic  ↗
  9. Godden, D. (2019). On the rational resolvability of deep disagreement through meta-argumentation: A resource …
    Topoi  ↗
  10. Godden, D. 2021 (forthcoming). The compliment of rational opposition: Disagreement, adversariality, and dispu…
     ↗
  11. The social construction of what?
  12. Hardy, G.H. [1940] 2012. A mathematician’s apology. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  13. Inglis, M., and A. Aberdein. 2015. Beauty is not simplicity: An analysis of mathematicians’ proof appraisals.…
    Philosophia Mathematica  ↗
  14. Jackson, S. 2019. Reason-giving and the natural normativity of argumentation. Topoi 38 (4): 631–643.
    Topoi  ↗
  15. Anyone Who Has a View
     ↗
  16. Leite, A. 2004. On justifying and being justified. Philosophical Issues, Epistemology 14: 219–253.
    Philosophical Issues, Epistemology  ↗
  17. Justice, gender and the family
  18. Sellars, W. [1956] 1997. Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge. MA: Harvard UP.
  19. Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking, and education
  20. Rationality redeemed: Further dialogues on an educational ideal
  21. Stevens, K. 2019. The roles we make others take: Thoughts on the ethics of arguing. Topoi 38 (4): 693–709.
    Topoi  ↗
  22. Wittgenstein, L. 1953. [PI] Philosophical investigations, 3rd ed. G.E.M. Anscombe (trans.). New York: Macmillan.
  23. Wittgenstein, L. 1969. [OC] On certainty. G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright (eds.). D. Paul and G.E.M. Ansc…
  24. Wright, L. 1995. Argument and deliberation: A plea for understanding. Journal of Philosophy 92: 565–585.
    Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  25. Argumentation