Argumentation Jun 2023

Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias

Catherine Hundleby University of Windsor
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2023-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-023-09603-y
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Liñán (2026)
    Adversarial Alignment in Argumentation
    Argumentation
  2. Holgado et al. (2025)
    Against the Neutral View of Poisoning the Well
    Argumentation
  3. Domínguez-Armas (2024)
    ‘Argumentative Disobedience’ as a Strategy to Confront Hate Speech
    Argumentation

References (29) · 6 in this index

  1. Al Tamimi, Khameiel. 2011. A gendered analysis of the role of authority in argumentation. In Argumentation: C…
  2. Anger, Beverly and Catherine Hundleby. 2016. “Ad Stuprum: The Appeal to Sex” in Bondy and Benacquista 2016: a…
  3. Cann (2018)
    Cann, Heather and Leigh Raymond. 2018. Does climate denialism still matter? The prevalence of alternative fra…
    Environmental Politics  ↗
  4. Ciurria et al. (2014)
    Argumentum ad Verecundiam: New Gender-based Criteria for Appeals to Authority
    Argumentation
  5. Lorraine Code (1995)
    Rhetorical spaces: essays on gendered locations
     ↗
Show all 29 →
  1. Margaret Crouch (1991)
    Crouch, Margaret. 1991. Feminist philosophy and the genetic fallacy. Hypatia 6 (2): 104–117. doi:https://doi.…
    Hypatia  ↗
  2. ––– (1993)
    Crouch, Margaret. 1993. A ‘limited’ defense of the genetic fallacy. Metaphilosophy 24 (3): 227–240. doi:https…
    Metaphilosophy  ↗
  3. Kristie Dotson (2011)
    Dotson, Kristie. 2011. Concrete flowers: contemplating the profession of philosophy. Hypatia 26 (2): 403–409.
    Hypatia  ↗
  4. Miranda Fricker (2007)
    Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing
     ↗
  5. Van Eeemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, C. W. Erik, and A. Krabbe Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheih, and…
     ↗
  6. Gaertner, Samuel I., John F. Dovidio, Jason Nier, Gordon Hodson, and A. Melissa, and Houlette. 2005. Aversive…
     ↗
  7. Trudy Govier (1993)
    Govier, Trudy. 1993. When logic meets politics: Testimony, distrust, and rhetorical disadvantage. Informal Lo…
    Informal Logic  ↗
  8. Sandra Harding (1986)
    The science question in feminism
  9. Catherine Hundleby (2016)
    Implicit Bias and Philosophy: volume 1, Metaphysics and Epistemology
     ↗
  10. Ivy, Veronica. 2021. If ‘ifs’ and ‘buts’ were candy and nuts: the failure of arguments against trans and inte…
     ↗
  11. Henry W Johnstone (1952)
    Johnstone, Henry W., Jr. 1952. Philosophy and argumentum ad hominem. The Journal of Philosophy 49 (15): 489–498.
    The Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  12. Kotzee (2010)
    Poisoning the Well and Epistemic Privilege
    Argumentation
  13. Margarita Levin (1988)
    Levin, Margarita. 1988. Caring new world: feminism and science. The American Scholar 57 (1): 100–106.
    The American Scholar
  14. Linker (2014)
    Epistemic Privilege and Expertise in the Context of Meta-debate
    Argumentation
  15. Helen Longino (1990)
    Science as social knowledge
     ↗
  16. Deborah Orr (1989)
    Orr, Deborah. 1989. ‘Just the facts Ma’am’: Informal logic, gender and pedagogy. Informal Logic 11 (1): 1–10.…
    Informal Logic  ↗
  17. Peach, Harmony, “Piggybacking in”? A critical discourse analysis of argumentation schemes” (2020). OSSA Confe…
  18. Stevens (2022)
    Silence at the Meta-Level: A Story about Argumentative Cruelty
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  19. Valian, Virginia. 1999. Why so slow? The advancement of women, revised edition. MIT Press.
     ↗
  20. Douglas N Walton (1995)
    A pragmatic theory of fallacy
  21. Walton (2006)
    Poisoning the Well
    Argumentation
  22. Douglas Walton (2008)
    Argumentation schemes
     ↗
  23. Yap (2013)
    Ad Hominem Fallacies, Bias, and Testimony
    Argumentation
  24. Yap, Audrey. 2015. Ad hominem fallacies and epistemic credibility. In Argument types and fallacies in legal a…
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Argumentation Sep 2026
    Benefits, Diversity, and Prospects of Experimental Methods in Argumentation ↗
    Jennifer Schumann; Steve Oswald
    argument race and writing
  2. Assessing Writing Jul 2026
    GPTZero and the challenges of AI detection in assessing writing ↗
    Louie Giray; Kershnee Sevnarayan; Kgabo Bridget Maphoto
    assessment artificial intelligence multilingual writers literacy studies race and writing editorial matter
  3. Assessing Writing Jul 2026
    From keystrokes to scores: Toward a multidimensional predictive model of writing evaluation by humans and large language models across linguistic, cognitive, and social dimensions ↗
    Qiao Gan; Benjamin Adams
    assessment artificial intelligence grammar and mechanics race and writing gender and writing
  4. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    Assessing fairness in finetuned scoring models with demographically restricted training data ↗
    Langdon Holmes; Wesley Morris; Scott Crossley; Joon Suh Choi
    assessment artificial intelligence race and writing
  5. Composition Forum 2026
    Embodying Class Participation: An Intersectional Self-Study of How and Why Students Participate ↗
    Mathew Gomes
    assessment race and writing gender and writing disability studies