Abstract
This paper introduces the potentials of crossing critical rhetoric and Critical Discourse Analysis in analyzing public discourse concerning one of the “corona topics”, namely institutional communication about the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine. The application of two complementary theoretical frameworks reveals discourse negotiation and naturalization of power and ideology in a persuasive discursive practice of issuing successive contradictory messages regarding the vaccine’s safety.
- Journal
- Res Rhetorica
- Published
- 2021-12-27
- DOI
- 10.29107/rr2021.4.7
- CompPile
- Open Access
- OA PDF Diamond
- Topics
-
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related articles
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Apr 2025Nirvana Tanoukhi; Nicholas Dunn
-
Res Rhetorica Oct 2024Gerardo Ramirez Vidal
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Sep 2024Joshua Hananmodern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism composition theory genre theory discourse analysis cultural rhetorics argument qualitative research quantitative research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric affect and writing body and rhetoric editorial matter
-
Rhetoric & Public Affairs Sep 2024Arthur E. Walzer
-
Rhetoric & Public Affairs Sep 2023José G. Izaguirre