Abstract
which charged that children's books were unfair to girls. Her strongest claim was that books for our youngest and therefore most impressionable children not only fail to represent the real world of today, but also combine into an almost incredible conspiracy of conditioning. Boys' achievement drive is encouraged; girls' is cut off. Boys are brought up to express themselves; girls to please. The general image of the female ranges from dull to degrading to invisible.
- Journal
- College English
- Published
- 1971-05-01
- DOI
- 10.2307/375631
- CompPile
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
-
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related articles
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Sep 2026Gender Differences in Nonverbals of Business Undergraduates: Self-Assessment Insights of Perceived Credibility ↗Daisy Tan
-
Assessing Writing Jul 2026From keystrokes to scores: Toward a multidimensional predictive model of writing evaluation by humans and large language models across linguistic, cognitive, and social dimensions ↗Qiao Gan; Benjamin Adams
-
Composition Forum 2026Mathew Gomes
-
Assessing Writing Oct 2025Which gender provides more specific peer feedback? Gender and assessment training’s effects on peer feedback specificity and intrapersonal factors ↗José Carlos G. Ocampo; Ernesto Panadero; David Zamorano; Iván Sánchez-Iglesias
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Apr 2025Nguyen Thi Hoang Bau; Thai Le Thuy Trang