Abstract
This study provides a new framework for thinking about the value of writing center work by illuminating how tutors define and negotiate their various and emergent identities as students and as professionals. We build on conversations about tutor identity to argue that tutors’ multiple roles affect the dynamics of the writing center as a whole. From interviews with graduate and undergraduate tutors about professionalization and the writing center, we reveal that the tutors’ level of resistance to or acceptance of writing center work impacts the extent to which they see themselves as burgeoning professionals within that space and, concomitantly, affects the sense of community in the writing center. At our site of study, undergraduate tutors who self-selected into writing center employment generally had much more positive associations with their writing center experiences than their graduate student counterparts, who were often compelled to work in the center as part of their assistantships. We argue then that while writing centers can be valuable in building the professional identities of both undergraduate and graduate tutors, the ways in which these different populations affect our centers is significant. As such, writing center professionals at all levels should work to acknowledge different identities and foster community among tutors who come to us with multiple backgrounds, purposes, and agendas.
- Journal
- Praxis: A Writing Center Journal
- Published
- 2017
- CompPile
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
-
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation context
Citation data not yet available for this article.
Citation data is not available for Praxis: A Writing Center Journal. This journal's publisher does not deposit reference lists with CrossRef.
Related articles
-
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2022Linguistic Justice on Campus: Pedagogy and Advocacy for Multilingual Students: Brooke R. Schreiber, Eunjeong Lee, Jennifer T. Johnson, and Norah Fahim: [Book Review] ↗Allison Durazzi
-
The Peer Review Sep 2021Alex Claman; Alex Claman; Claire Seekins; Seanie Mardell
-
The Peer Review Sep 2020
-
Assessing Writing Oct 2026Student-AI collaboration in peer feedback: Effects on perceived feedback quality, emotional responses, and feedback literacy development ↗Hua Wang; Kai Guo
-
Written Communication Jul 2026“It Tends to Remove Things I Originally Wanted to Emphasize”: Effects of ChatGPT Revision on Rhetorical Move-Steps in Personal Statements ↗Qiuya Jing; Yingying Liu