Abstract
The literature on public writing and community literacy has generally focused on how to get students to go public in effective and ethical ways. This article instead addresses a prior concern, the problem of why to go public. I argue that students (and Americans generally) are immersed within a cultural ecology of civic disengagement that manifests itself through powerful rhetorics of adaptation. These rhetorics encourage people’s adaptation to unjust societal conditions rather than activism to change these conditions. Hence, before helping students determine what kind of difference they should make, civically engaged writing teachers must help students see that they can make a difference . I call on engaged teachers to facilitate opportunities for students to confront, analyze, and challenge rhetorics of adaptation, and in turn, to maladjust creatively to the anti-civic surround by invoking counterhegemonic rhetorics of activism.
- Journal
- Composition Forum
- Published
- 2012
- CompPile
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
-
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related articles
-
Research in the Teaching of English Nov 2025William J. Fassbender; Bradley Robinson
-
Communication Design Quarterly Sep 2024Amber Buck
-
Communication Design Quarterly Jun 2024Amber Buck
-
Pedagogy Jan 2024
-
Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric Dec 2023Keshia Mcclantoc; Ada Hubrig