Abstract
Current composition practice relies on a decades-old summary of research concluding that a focus on grammar in students’ writing is useless, or even harmful. Conversely, hundreds of recent studies from the fields of second-language writing and applied linguistics claim to provide evidence of the benefits to providing feedback on grammar in students’ writing. This article summarizes the arguments for and against such feedback and problematizes the results of previous research by describing a quasi-experimental study measuring the effects, both positive and negative, of providing students with grammar feedback on their writing. Results show that, while feedback on specific grammatical forms improved participants’ accuracy on those forms, it also led to decreased accuracy on other forms related to but not the focus of instruction. Furthermore, the control group’s accuracy equaled or surpassed that of the two feedback groups.
- Journal
- Composition Forum
- Published
- 2020
- CompPile
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
-
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related articles
-
Assessing Writing Jul 2026From keystrokes to scores: Toward a multidimensional predictive model of writing evaluation by humans and large language models across linguistic, cognitive, and social dimensions ↗Qiao Gan; Benjamin Adams
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jun 2026Caroline Koons; Amelia Chesley
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026Frederike Strahl; Jörg Kilian; Jens Möller
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026How do L2 writing subskills interact hierarchically? Insights from diagnostic classification models ↗Farshad Effatpanah; Hamdollah Ravand; Mahmoud Abdi Tabari; Yi-Hsin Chen; Olga Kunina-Habenicht
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026Pursuing fair writing assessment: Halo effects in primary school foreign language writing in grade six ↗Ruth Trüb; Julian Lohmann; Jens Möller; Stefan D. Keller