Computers and Composition

29 articles
Year – Topic Clear
Export Subscribe (Atom)
gender and writing×

June 2026

  1. Navigating platform algorithms: Global south feminist activists’ rhetorical and composition practices in digital advocacy on social media ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2026.102994

June 2024

  1. The effects of automaticity in paper and keyboard-based text composing: An exploratory study ↗
    Abstract

    The predictive relationship between handwriting automaticity and children's writing performance is well documented. However, less is known about the relationship between keyboarding automaticity and children's keyboard-based writing performance. In this exploratory study, we examined the unique contributions of automaticity in both writing modalities in predicting Grade 2 students (N = 49) paper-based and keyboard-based writing performance (i.e., compositional quality and fluency) after controlling for students’ literacy skills (i.e., spelling, word reading, and reading comprehension), attitudes toward writing, gender, and nesting due to classroom. Multilevel modelling results showed that automaticity predicted students’ paper-based compositional quality and keyboard-based compositional quality and fluency. Findings further suggested that the relationship between automaticity and writing performance was stronger in keyboard-based text composing than in paper-based text composing. These results reinforce the role of automaticity of transcription skills in predicating the writing performance of beginning writers across modalities and stress the significance of explicit pedagogy and frequent instances of practice to promote the mastery of transcription skills across modalities in the early years of schooling.

    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102848
  2. Navigating the emotional terrain of Wikipedia writing: A feminist affective analysis of student writers’ engagement with the “be bold” guideline ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102850

March 2023

  1. “Make your feed work for you”: Tactics of feminist affective resistance on social media ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102762

March 2021

  1. People As Data?: Developing an Ethical Framework for Feminist Digital Research ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102630

September 2020

  1. Acting with Algorithms: Feminist Propositions for Rhetorical Agency ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102581

December 2019

  1. Stigma in the Comments Section: Feminist and Anti-Feminist Discussions Online ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102515

June 2019

  1. Feminist Rhetorical Practices in Digital Spaces ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2019.01.004

March 2019

  1. “Feminist Leanings:” Tracing Technofeminist and Intersectional Practices and Values in Three Decades of Computers and Composition ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2018.11.004
  2. An Intersectional Technofeminist Framework for Community-Driven Technology Innovation ↗
    Abstract

    In this article, we describe the philosophy, objectives, and development of Multilingual User-Experience (Multilingual UX), a community-driven initiative for supporting technology innovation with marginalized communities. We highlight how community-based mentorship can guide innovative technology design through an intersectional technofeminist perspective. We begin with a discussion of the impetus for building this initiative before discussing how we are collaboratively designing a research center to facilitate technology design with and for marginalized communities. We both theorize and enact the intersectional technofeminist principles of our work by telling the story of our project with our collaborators and community partners, in the form of vignettes from a symposium. We conclude by looking ahead to our next steps and by offering strategies for intersectional technofeminist community building and technology innovation, in the hope that our experiences can be further developed and localized to support similar initiatives that highlight the value of feminist collaboration in technology design.

    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2018.11.005

December 2018

  1. Teaching a Critical Digital Literacy of Wearables: A Feminist Surveillance as Care Pedagogy ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2018.07.006

June 2017

  1. Haul, Parody, Remix: Mobilizing Feminist Rhetorical Criticism With Video ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2017.03.002

March 2016

  1. Men, women, and Web 2.0 writing: Gender difference in Facebook composing ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.11.002

December 2015

  1. Locating Queer Rhetorics: Mapping as an Inventional Method ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.011

September 2015

  1. Wikipedia's Politics of Exclusion: Gender, Epistemology, and Feminist Rhetorical (In)action ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.06.009

December 2010

  1. “Twilight is so anti-feminist that I want to cry:” Twilight fans finding and defining feminism on the World Wide Web ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2010.09.006

January 2000

  1. Eighth graders, gender, and online publishing: A story of teacher and student collaboration ↗
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(00)00027-x

January 1999

  1. Wired women: Gender and new realities in cyberspace ↗
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(99)80014-0
  2. “I plan to be a 10”: Online literacy and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender students ↗
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(99)80006-1
  3. The gender gap in computers and composition research: Must boys be boys? ↗
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(99)80009-7
  4. Greeks, grandmothers, and gender: A web site review ↗
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(99)80013-9
  5. Wired women writing: Towards a feminist theorization of hypertext ↗
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(99)80004-8
  6. Why do women feel lgnored? gender differences in computer-mediated classroom interactions ↗
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(99)80011-5
  7. Feminist interventions in electronic environments ↗
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(99)80008-5
  8. The masquerade: Gender, identity, and writing for the web ↗
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(99)80010-3
  9. Writing multiplicity: Hypertext and feminist textual politics ↗
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(99)80005-x
  10. Women and computer-based technologies: A feminist perspective ↗
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(99)80017-6

January 1998

  1. Virtual voices in “letters across cultures”: Listening for race, class, and gender ↗
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(98)90005-6

January 1997

  1. Cyberbabes: (Self-) representation of women and the virtual male gaze ↗
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(97)90020-7